About the Trust
Rodenticide Press release
PDF Documents are used throughout this site. Click here to get Adobe Reader to be able to view these documents.
- Barn Owls are Britain's most popular farmland bird but they have declined by at least 70% and there are only 4,000 pairs left. (Ref:1,2)
- Major Roads: One third of all the young Barn Owls produced annually (3,000 birds) end up dead on trunk roads. At least 1,000 adult Barn Owls are also killed annually. (Ref:3)
- The Highways Agency has ignored recommendations made in 2003 and has singularly failed to do anything to reduce mortality. 3,000 more young Barn Owls will die this autumn. Trunk roads kill 450 times more Barn Owls (per mile) than other roads. (Ref:4)
- Rat Poison: Government figures (from 2010) show that a staggering 91% of Barn Owls contain rat/mouse poison (rodenticide). Some die as a direct result. Most contain sub lethal doses that could be reducing the owls hunting ability and nesting success. (Ref:5,6)
- The use of rodenticides is largely uncontrolled and the information on containers is both misleading and inadequate: Most people who use rodenticides have no idea that they are poisoning Barn Owls and other wildlife.
- The first-ever Barn Owl Conservation Handbook1, published this year exposes these issues and is a highly critical wake-up call for the Highways Agency, the rodenticide manufacturers, and the Health and Safety Executive' s Chemicals Regulation Directorate.
Numbers are Scientific references included below
Barn Owls are stunningly beautiful and to see one, hunting at dusk, is a magnificent sight. However most of the wild Barn Owls people see these days are dead on the roadside. If you're really lucky and see a live Barn Owl the chances are that it will already be poisoned. Government research has shown that the vast majority of Britain's Barn Owls contain highly toxic rat poison. Overall, the population has declined by at least 70% since the 1930's and researchers have identified trunk roads and rat poisons as two of the most likely causes.
Before the first motorway was built, in 1959, roads accounted for only 6% of reported Barn Owl deaths but according to latest figures 50% of reported deaths are road casualties and the vast majority of these are found on Britain's trunk road network - over 6,000 miles of mainly motorways and dual-carriageways. Each year, around 3,000 young Barn Owls (that's about a third of all those that fledge) end up dead on the side of a major road. It used to be thought that the high number of juveniles dying on roads every autumn was unimportant because at that time of year so many young birds die of other causes. Research by the Barn Owl Trust has shown that most of the young Barn Owls killed on trunk roads are the ones that should have survived rather than those that were going to die anyway. Since 2003 the Trust has been asking the Highways Agency to implement recommendations aimed at reducing the annual death toll. Head of Conservation, David Ramsden MBE, commented, "We have been waiting for the Highways Agency to improve the design of road verges for nine years. They have singularly failed to take effective action. If we, as a society, cannot protect such an iconic ‘protected species' as the Barn Owl, what hope is there for the rest of our native wildlife?"
The situation with rat poison is an even greater cause of concern. Figures from the government's own Predatory Bird Monitoring Scheme (2010) have shocked conservationists. A staggering 91% of dead Barn Owls submitted by members of the public (mainly road casualties) contain highly toxic anti-coagulant rodenticide poison. A minority are known to have died as a direct result of eating poisoned rodents but most carcasses contain a sub-lethal dose.
As the rodenticide industry is quick to point out, there is no evidence that sub-lethal doses have any effect on Barn Owls. But in fact, there is no evidence that it is NOT affecting them. Nest cameras such as those used by BBC Springwatch have revealed marked differences in the behaviour of breeding Barn Owls. Mr Ramsden said, "Some Barn Owls are far more energetic than others. We know that safe medicinal doses of the anti-coagulant Warfarin can have side effects in humans including nausea. The anti-coagulants found in Barn Owls are 100 to 1,000 times more acutely toxic than Warfarin and can cause lethargy. Even if behavioural changes are slight, with 76% of farms using highly toxic rodenticides and 91% of Barn Owls contaminated, the effect could be dramatic because almost the entire population is affected".
"Most people who use rat poison have no idea about the risk to wildlife and pets; they think that bait-covering prevents Barn Owls being poisoned. In reality, no amount of bait covering makes the slightest difference because poisoned rats and mice take 3-14 days to die, during this time they carry the poison out into the open within their bodies and are then eaten by owls and other predators such as foxes and cats. This is termed secondary poisoning . "Rodenticide manufacturers know that their products kill Barn Owls and other predators", Mr Ramsden added, "The information on rodenticide containers is totally inadequate. It does not say ‘this product kills Barn Owls and other protected species'. It does not inform the user that ‘bait covering makes virtually no difference to secondary poisoning' . It does not say ‘91% of Barn Owls analysed contain this type of poison' and it does not say ‘we do not know what effect this is having on predatory birds'.
The Barn Owl Trust is hoping that the new Barn Owl Conservation Handbook, published this month, will raise awareness of both issues. "This is a wake-up call for the rodenticide industry, the Health and Safety Executive that licences pesticides, and the Highways Agency who have singularly failed to protect Barn Owls on our trunk roads. By December this year another 3,000 innocent young Barn Owls will die unless the Agency does something".
For further information:
Barn Owl Conservation Handbook
Published 2nd July 2012
by Pelagic Publishing
ISBN 978-1-907807-14-5 (Paperback)
ISBN 978-1-907807-34-3 (eBook)
1. Barn Owl Trust (2012) Barn Owl Conservation Handbook, Pelagic Publishing, Exeter
2. Toms, M.P., Crick, H.Q.P. & Shawyer, C.R. (2000) Project Barn Owl Final Report. BTO Research Report No.197/HOT Research Report 98/1. Thetford: British Trust for Ornithology.
3. Shawyer, C.R. & Dixon, N. (1999) Impact of Roads on Barn Owl Tyto alba Populations. Unpublished report to the Highways Agency, London.
4. Ramsden, D.J. (2003) Barn Owls and Major Roads: Results and Recommendations from a 15 year Research Project. Ashburton,Devon: Barn Owl Trust.
5. Walker, L.A., Llewellyn, N.R., Pereira M.G., Potter, E.D., Sainsbury, A.W. & Shore, R.F. (2012). Anticoagulant rodenticides in predatory birds 2010: a Predatory Bird Monitoring Scheme (PBMS) report. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, UK. 17pp.
6. Taylor, I. (1994) Barn Owls: Predator-Prey Relationships and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
About the Barn Owl Trust:
The Barn Owl Trust is based in the southwest of England, it began its work with Barn Owls in 1984 and became a national registered charity in 1988. Its main areas of work are practical conservation, education, research and the provision of information. The Trust is the main source of Barn Owl information in Britain dealing with over 5,000 conservation enquiries a year. The advice the Trust provides is based on 26 years of first-hand experience in practical and advisory conservation work on farms, over 20 years of research and educational work, plus first-hand experience in habitat creation and management on the Trust's own land.
The Barn Owl Trust's website has a huge range of information including video clips, over 70 slideshows, downloads and information leaflets covering all aspects of Barn Owl conservation.
'Conserving the Barn Owl and its Environment.'